Part I: Ready for What?
Part II: Are Your Children Ready for Real Life?
Part III: Arts and Culture
Part IV: Science and Medicine
Part V: History and Law
Part VI: Vocations
Part VII: Q&A Session
Conclusion
Over the next few weeks, I will review the "Ready for Real Life" talks, a webinar series on Christian homeschooling hosted by Geoffrey Botkins of the Western Conservatory of the Arts and Sciences. In part I, the Botkin family celebrated religious homeschooling as a means of exercising Christian dominion and resisting a supposedly sinful culture. In part II, "Are Your Children Ready for Real Life?", Geoffrey Botkin and family laid out how Christian homeschoolers should approach the surrounding culture and establish Christianity as their foundation.
Botkins began the webinar with a prayer, thanking God for children and for the way God has designed their lives. He prayed for wisdom and joy in raising children, reminding listeners that they were raising offspring in a supposedly perilous time. "They're being launched into a very difficult, trying, uncertain century, and we're living in a country that's no longer as steady and solid and righteous as it once was," he said at the 1:17 mark.
Botkins stressed that the best way parents can teach their children to think is to begin with the science of the mind. All science is theological, he insisted, because all things are theological. "True" scientists in past eras knew that they had to look to theology for a true understanding of reality, he claimed.
God created the mind and personally develops the minds of children, Botkin said. However, the same God can also inhibit the minds of people with poor attitudes and render them mentally slow. "God sharpens the ability to think ... or he deliberately deranges the ability to think depending on the attitude of the child or the adult," he told listeners at the 2:50 mark. At the 4:28 mark, he admonished parents to teach their children well, lest their children behave unrighteously and bring down the wrath of God on themselves.
"Parents, you need to realize that your children and all those children who suppress the truth in unrighteousness personally receive the wrath of God ... You cannot let your children suppress the truth that you're teaching them. You can't suppress any part of it."God's inflicts his wrath on unrighteous people by instilling them with "moral stupidity", he claimed. In other words, God causes "moral rebels" to lose their minds, resulting in people who are both intellectually and morally stunted. "All sin makes people intellectually as well as morally stupid," Botkin asserted, correlating moral clarity with mental clarity.
Botkin's comment about God "deranging" people's minds stunned me. Was his statement meant to instill fear in listeners? Believe and have a good attitude or God will scramble your brain! Or was he blaming learning impediments on impiety? If the latter, Botkin's words essentially blame people for any learning challenges they might face. The idea that learning impediments or problems focusing could have emotional roots (depression, anxiety, trauma) or physiological roots (ADHD, dyslexia, nutritional deficiencies) seems to have escaped Botkin, who prefers to blame the sufferer.
In addition to being fanatical and brazen, Botkin's comments were incorrect. If Christian fundamentalism brings moral clarity, which in turn yields mental clarity, one would expect fundamentalist Christians to be brilliant and everyone else to be dotards. However, intelligent people and slow people are to be found among Christians and non-Christians alike. How could Botkin ignore this simple, self-evident fact?
Botkin redefined the word "superstition" to refer to critical approaches to fundamentalism. He reminded parents that they need to correctly interpret the world for their children while in the midst of a "superstitious" culture. One of the most destructive "superstitions" in modern society is the belief that smart people have abandoned God's covenantal ethics, Botkin claimed.
Parents must teach their children how to decipher our "broken, immoral culture" by using scripture as the standard for all thinking, Botkin insisted. A child's moral foundation must rest on the ethical system of the Bible, he stressed. Botkin spent several minutes speaking warmly of raising children with God's law.
At this point, Geoffrey Botkin's son David chimed in. David Botkin emphasized to listeners that parents must teach children the word of God with great sincerity, and that the word of God must dominate children's lives. David spoke approvingly of his father's influence in his life, such as his father's emphasis on scripture as a tool for interpreting the world and his love of R.J. Rushdoony's Institutes of Biblical Law.
David stressed that the law of God applies to everyone, including the President, and to all matters. He claimed that while in Washington D.C., his father was included in a conference call regarding military action after Saddam Hussein's forces invaded Kuwait. According to David's account, Geoffrey Botkin advised the conference call participants to give a warning to Saddam Hussein before initiating military action, in keeping with Biblical teachings, and later felt ashamed when he could not recall the exact Biblical verses supporting this approach.
Geoffrey Botkin's daughters, Anna Sophia and Elizabeth, chimed into the discussion as well. Anna Sophia Botkin discussed daily scripture reading in the Botkin family, sharing a quote from Cotton Mather on drawing lessons out of Bible verses. Elizabeth Botkin explored the question of whether it is beneficial to make children read the Bible if they don't want to. She admitted that as a child, she did not always enjoy reading the Bible, but she was eventually saved over time by reading scripture. Only scripture can reform an "unregenerate heart", she said, quoting a passage in Romans 10 that associated faith with hearing the word of God.
Geoffrey Botkin emphasized that parents must teach their children critical thinking, given the importance of discernment in navigating a world steeped in "superstition and falsehood". Christians cannot be carried away by every "wind of doctrine", and thus Christian parents must teach their children to have strong convictions in their faith. Otherwise, a child's faith can be "stolen" by another child who dares them to change their mind. When teaching his children discernment, Geoffrey Botkin instructed them to ask two questions about any issue: what is lawful, and under whose jurisdiction does the matter fall?
The Botkins talked at length about how parents must be gatekeepers over what information their children absorb. Geoffrey's son Isaac Botkin noted that his father taught him to look for "useful work by the ungodly", that is, positive cultural contributions by non-Christians. Geoffrey Botkin expanded on this point at the 44:03 mark, arguing that Christians can learn from non-Christian writers while rejecting their supposedly fallacious conclusions.
"We go to the ungodly sometimes to learn from them in matters of detail, while we differ wholly on matters of principle, and that's what we teach. We teach our children principle. We say, 'Look at this poor writer. He's seeing everything that's going on. He makes phenomenal observations, but conclusions are mixed up.' Why? Because he does not understand Biblical principle."I found Botkin's comments to be contradictory. Earlier in the webinar, Geoffrey Botkin argued that people with impious attitudes can be afflicted with both moral and intellectual stupidity. Later, however, Botkin admitted that non-Christians can make intelligent observations and offer cultural contributions of substance. I remain puzzled on how Geoffrey Botkin reconciles these two assertions.
Geoffrey Botkin addressed a listener's question on how soon to expose children to the internet and to writers that one disagrees with. In response, he argued that a child's spiritual character, rather than their chronological age, determines when they are ready for such influences. At the 45:55 mark, he argued against giving internet access to a child who is "pining away" for "fellowship or companionship with the bad guys", framing the outside world as a potentially corrupting enemy.
"If you're a friend of the world, you're at war with God, and because we're training our children to be on the right side of the battle, the great antithesis of time, the battlefield that I spoke of earlier, they must stay on the right side ... If I have a child who's really pining away for the grass greener on the other side of the fence, on the other part of the battlefield where all the enemies are because he wants to have fellowship or companionship with the bad guys, I would not let him be on the internet or to be reading somebody's book. He's not ready, he's not willing, he's not able to absorb the truth and process it and then apply it to the battle in the right way. We could train some of our children to be skilled in many different things and turn them loose to fight for the wrong side if we're not careful about what we give them and when we give them."Geoffrey Botkin's words on the outside world were revealing. In Botkin's worldview, the larger world is an ominous enemy "battlefield", where Christians must fight for dominion. Non-fundamentalist ideas from "bad guys" serve as potentially corrupting influences that can contaminate unsuspecting minds. Such an attitude is not conducive to critical thinking, open-mindedness, or a robust learning experience.
Victoria Botkin and several of the Botkin children spoke at length about effective writing and the importance of writing in a homeschool curriculum. The Botkin children spent the rest of the webinar discussing various topics around communication, such as effective speaking, the flaws of excessive reliance on "humanistic" rational argument, and struggles with social awkwardness. Even this seemingly mundane subject drew revealing commentary from the Botkins. For instance, David Botkin argued that good writing must reflect unwavering dedication to some absolute truth. At the 1:06:10 mark, David claimed that "ideological heavyweights" among Christianity's "enemies" were effective communicators because they tenaciously clung to their standpoints.
"The word of God needs to be your standard for absolute truth in everything that you write ... When we think about the ideological heavyweights of the last couple centuries, our enemies, people like Marx and Mao Zedong, these have all been people that resolutely clung to something as a source of absolute truth, and that's what made them effective. If you don't resolutely cling to something as a source of absolute truth, and I say it needs to be scripture, then what you write, your output, will be weak and affective."First, when I think of intellectual "heavyweights" from the past two centuries, ideologues such as Mao Zedong do not come to mind. David Botkin could have chosen from hundreds of groundbreaking men and women whose ideas changed the world, but he chose Marx (a boogeyman of fundamentalists) and Mao Zedong (a communist dictator) instead. Second, effective writing rests on sound reasoning and solid evidence for one's claims, not necessarily stubbornness. Many good thinkers are willing to evolve, adjusting their ideas as new evidence or new arguments become available. Confidence and sound arguments, not inflexibility, are the marks of a mature thinker.
At the end of the webinar, Geoffrey Botkin encouraged listeners to take in part III of the webinar series, "Ready to Lead Culture". At the 1:20:03 mark, he emphasized the importance of teaching children to carry out Christian dominion in the arts and media, which will be discussed in depth in the next webinar.
"You must be getting your children ready not just to follow along and conform themselves to the culture that they're in, but literally to analyze it and then lead it and realize what needs to be done, realize their place in the world. They have the authority to lead it. How to take dominion of the arts without the arts taking dominion of you. So, your children are exposed to all kinds of media and the arts every day. Is it taking control of them and taking dominion over them, or do they have wisdom to know how to take dominion over that, to either get rid of it, to change it, to jump in there and lead the way in music and in the visual arts, in media, in filmaking?"In conclusion, part II of the "Ready for Real Life" webinar series featured the following themes:
- Fundamentalist Christianity as the foundation of children's lives. The Botkins argued for the centrality of the Bible -- or rather, an inerrant interpretation of the Bible -- in the moral and intellectual lives of children.
- The outside world as an enemy and a corrupting influence. The Botkins repeatedly spoke of the outside world as "bad guys" and an "enemy", describing Christian interaction with the larger world in terms of battle. The webinar repeatedly framed Christian interaction with society as a zero sum game; Christians could either exert dominion over the surrounding culture, or succumb to its contaminating influence. The idea that Christians could be part of an open marketplace of ideas, rather than exercise dominion or be dominated, was not considered.
- Parental control over what children absorb. The Botkins stressed the importance of keeping children away from non-Christian cultural influences until their adherence to Christianity was solid. Non-Christian materials could be introduced to children's curricula later, but the Botkins encouraged parents to point out ideas that did not reflect fundamentalism. ("Look at this poor writer. He's seeing everything that's going on. He makes phenomenal observations, but conclusions are mixed up. Why? Because he does not understand Biblical principle.")
- Christian faith equated with intelligence. Geoffrey Botkin made the profoundly flawed argument that Christian faith produces both moral and intellectual sharpness, and likewise, that impiety produces moral and intellectual "stupidity". However, in a seeming contradiction of this claim, the Botkins later assert that non-Christians could make sophisticated cultural contributions. While the Botkins acknowledged that non-Christian thinkers could offer useful information, they still viewed such thinkers as imperfect at best.
Stay tuned for commentary on part III of the Botkin's "Ready for Real Life" webinar!
There's almost too much to comment on here, but what really hit me was this part:
ReplyDeleteFirst, when I think of intellectual "heavyweights" from the past two centuries, ideologues such as Mao Zedong do not come to mind. David Botkin could have chosen from hundreds of groundbreaking men and women whose ideas changed the world, but he chose Marx (a boogeyman of fundamentalists) and Mao Zedong (a communist dictator) instead.
If I had to choose one person as the most revolutionary thinker of all time, it would be Charles Darwin. No one else, before or since, has so radically transformed our conception of life and of what we as human beings are. The realization that we are actually animals, and that all life on Earth is literally related, has such tremendous implications that even now, 154 years later, we are still struggling to come to terms with them. And Darwin achieved his insights not by clinging "resolutely" to some ancient preconceived notion, but by carefully observing the evidence and following where it led.
The Botkins' view of human knowledge is closed-off and dead -- it's a view in which the final answers to everything important are already known and there is nothing new to be discovered. This attitude has been an obstacle to progress wherever and whenever it has held power. If their view became dominant, it would make the US a stagnant society, while progress was carried on elsewhere.
Infidel -- You nailed it. No matter how much the Botkins wax poetic about learning, their teaching model is stagnant and constrictive. If they already believe that they have all the answers via the Bible, what motivation is there to discover or question?
DeleteI find it ironic that the Botkins family sees the "outside world" as a corrupting influence. Jesus came to Earth and live among the people -- most of them very poor. He picked some of the most hated people of his day for followers: fishermen, a tax collector, women. He touched lepers and healed them, and allowed the bleeding woman to touch him so she would be healed. His final command was to out into the world and preach the Gospel to all the nations -- not sit at home in your fortress and hide.
ReplyDeleteIf Jesus had lived as the Botkins family advises, we wouldn't have Christianity. There wouldn't be any followers!
Anonymous -- This tendency to recoil from a supposedly "evil" world is one I'm seeing in different parts of the fundamentalist world. As you explained, though, it's contrary to Jesus' example -- and nearly impossible too. The world is growing smaller and more connected, and people need to engage it instead of flee from it.
DeleteI find it ironic that the Botkins family sees the outside world as evil. Jesus came to Earth and lived among the poorest of the poor. He picked some of society's most despised people for his followers: fishermen, a tax collector, women. He touched and healed those deemed untouchable: lepers, the bleeding woman, a Roman soldier's daughter. His final command was to go into the world and preach the Gospel to all nations.
ReplyDeleteIf Jesus had followed the Botkins way of life, we wouldn't have Christianity today. He would have stayed inside his home and there wouldn't be any followers!