Showing posts with label Mike Huckabee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Huckabee. Show all posts

Monday, August 15, 2016

Trump and Rubio Consort with Homophobes Before Anniversary of Pulse Massacre, Part II




As discussed in a prior post, Sen. Marco Rubio and Donald Trump both addressed right-wing audiences in Orlando. On August 11th, Trump spoke before an audience of clergy members and their spouses at the Pastors and Pews gathering in Orlando, according to Bloomberg. The event was sponsored by the American Renewal Project, whose founder, David Lane, opposes LGBTQ equality. To add insult to injury for the LGBTQ community the gathering took place shortly before the two-month anniversary of the Orlando Pulse massacre.

C-SPAN posted a video of Trump's speech. At the podium, Trump avoided talk about LGBTQ issues, focusing instead on naked pandering to his conservative evangelical audience. Trump told his listeners that they had been silenced by the Johnson amendment, assuring them that he would repeal the amendment if elected president. Feeding his audience's sense of imagined persecution, Trump promised to address that supposed persecution by weakening church-state separation.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee introduced Trump. At the 2:03 mark, Huckabee assured his audience that Trump had Christian credentials.
"I'm also aware that a lot of my fellow believers and evangelicals sometimes say, 'Is Donald Trump, like, one of us?' Well, let me try to be as blunt as I can be. He may not sit in the front of a church like yours every Sunday. He may not be as expressive or as loud about his own faith or convictions about things like being pro-life, which he is, and if he wasn't, I wouldn't be standing here today. But folks, some people will eat their soup a little louder than others. It doesn't mean that the soup tastes better."
Trump took his place at the podium and spent the next forty minutes reinforcing his audience's imagined persecution complex with phrases such as, "Without religious liberty, you don't have liberty" and "You've been silenced, like a child has been silenced". He called Christian clergy "the most powerful lobby there is, and yet you've been totally silenced," referring to the Johnson amendment that prevents tax-exempt entities such as churches from endorsing political candidates. "It's Lyndon Johnson wanting to silence people that didn't feel so good about him, in particular one church," he said of the policy.

At the 14:01 mark, Trump shared a story in which he was stunned that religious leaders couldn't endorse him because of church-state separation, having been ignorant of the Johnson amendment.

"So I'm in the room with many of the pastors and some ministers, and they're going like, 'Well, we can't really do that.' I said, 'Why? Why can't you do that? I don't understand. I know you like me. Why aren't you endorsing me?' "Well, we just can't' ... These were strong men ... and women ... It wasn't that they didn't want to tell me. It's almost like they got used to this thing around their neck and eyes, and it's almost like they couldn't see ... After a lot of prodding, they said, 'Well, we don't want to lose our tax-exempt status." I said, 'What does that have to do with your tax-exempt status?', not knowing. And it basically has to do with the 501(c)(3) status that they can't get involved from the standpoint of essentially freedom of speech. So you have these powerful people with a great voice. You know that Christianity...has had a very, very tough time."
At the 34:43 mark, Trump pressed his listeners to make voters out of their congregants at all costs.
"You have to get your congregations and you have to get parishioners, you have to get all of your people to go out and vote. You got to get them to sign those cards early. In many cases, you can vote before November 8th. This way, there's no excuses. I joke a lot, and I say if you're sick, if you've just got the worst prognosis that a doctor can give you, if you're lying in bed and you just know you're not going to make it, you have to get up on November 8th and you have to vote."
Considering how disappointing Trump's poll numbers look, it's no wonder that he's begging for every vote he can get.


To read additional commentary, visit the following links.

Bloomberg: Trump Goes Traditional With Florida Meeting of Evangelical Leaders

Right Wing Watch: Donald Trump: Vote For Me To Help Me Get Into Heaven

Mother Jones: Trump Addresses Conference Hosted by a Group Whose Leader Called Homosexuality a Marxist Plot


Friday, December 18, 2015

The "Undercard" GOP Presidential Debate: Be Afraid!

Republican presidential candidates sparred during another debate in Las Vegas, Nevada on December 15th, with ISIS and national security as hot topics for the night. The "undercard" debate at the Venetian Resort Hotel Casino featured New York Governor George Pataki, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham.

Some Republican candidates are kindling fear among voters, pointing to Islamic extremism as an ongoing danger to America. As these quotes from a New York Times debate transcript demonstrate, some undercard debate participants used fear-based rhetoric as a campaign strategy. For example, Santorum warned the audience that America has entered "World War III", but that President Obama is supposedly in denial about it.
SANTORUM: This is an important time in our country’s history. We have entered World War III. World War III has begun and we have a leader who refuses to identify it and be truthful to the American people to the stakes that are involved, in part, because his policies have led us here.
Huckabee claimed that recent violence has left the American people frightened, and that their fear is exacerbated by a government they supposedly can't trust. Huckabee spoke of genuine threats (extremist violence) and imagined threats (Syrian refugees) in the same breath.
HUCKABEE: Americans are not only angry — angry at their government that they feel like has failed them, been indifferent to them, cost them their livelihoods — but they’re in addition to angry, they’re just plain scared. They’re scared when they thing that they go to a Christmas party and get shot at by somebody who sat and had lunch with them an hour earlier. They’re scared when they realize that our government, who promises that it can vet people and is begging us to approve bringing 10,000 Syrian refugees into this country, can’t even catch somebody after a third background check, who had posted things on social media clearly indicating she wanted to kill Americans. And we couldn’t catch that. We’ve lost confidence in our government. And when Americans lose confidence in their government, we’re in a dangerous place. We’re in danger because we have an enemy that is out to kill us, and we have a government that we don’t trust any more. This election is about going back to having a government we can trust with leaders who have the courage and conviction to actually lead and not follow.
The usual themes emerge: America is in danger, citizens should feel fear, and Obama's administration can't protect us. Such candidates then present themselves as an antidote to that fear, as a strong protector who will supposedly lead America back to safety. Trump, Huckabee, and Santorum are among the Republican candidates using fear as a campaign strategy -- fear of refugees, fear of Muslims, and fear of the government.

Fortunately, some of the input from Graham and Pataki was more measured. Graham acknowledged that Trump's anti-Muslim rhetoric is destructive because it fails to distinguish reasonable Muslims from Islamic extremists, and because such language is not conducive to international cooperation.
LINDSEY GRAHAM: ...The good news for everybody in this room is, after 36 trips to Iraq and Afghanistan, most people over there, Wolf, are not buying what ISIL’s selling. This is a religious war between radical Islam and the rest of the world. And there’s only one way you’re going to win this war. Help people in Islam who reject radical Islam to fight over there and destroy this ideology. Donald Trump has done the one single thing you cannot do. Declare war on Islam itself. ISIL would be dancing in the streets, they just believe in dancing. This is a coup for them, and to all of our Muslim friends throughout the world, like the King of Jordan and the President of Egypt, I am sorry. He does not represent us. If I am President, we will work together. People in the faith to all over the world destroy this radical ideology. Declaring war on the religion only helps ISIL.
Pataki, too, disagreed with the anti-Muslim rhetoric coming from some quarters. In the wake of Trump's inflammatory comments about Muslims, Pataki noted that discrimination based on religion is immoral and unconstitutional.
GEORGE PATAKI: To target a religion and say that regardless of whether you’re an American soldier who has fought on our side or allies we have overseas, simply because of your religion we’re going to ban you is un-American, it is unconstitutional and it is wrong. And by the way, Wolf, now there was a group that tried to do that 150 to 160 years ago, they were called the Know-Nothing Party. They wanted to ban Catholics. They thought they were going to destroy America.
Fear can be a powerful motivator, and several Republicans are using fear to draw support for their presidential campaigns. Voters must learn how to distinguish rational fears from irrational fears, lest they be duped by manipulative politicians. Voters must channel their fear into constructive political and social actions, not into xenophobia, paranoia, and scapegoating. In time, we'll see if fear produces votes for fear-mongering candidates, or if a saner candidate prevails.



Saturday, November 14, 2015

More Religious Right Reactions to the Paris Attacks

Steadily, members of the Christian Right are responding to yesterday's terrorist attacks in Paris. Not surprisingly, some are using the tragedy as an opportunity to sermonize on their favorite political topics. In the past twenty-four hours, commentators have used the Paris attacks to slam President Obama, demand closed borders, and warn believers about "moral decadence" leaving nations vulnerable.

First, former Arkansas governor and Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee issued a statement on the Paris attacks. In his November 14th statement, Huckabee defended his positions on Syrian refugees and tighter border security, arguing that these were reasonable responses to "a threat to western civilization."
"...We are clearly not dealing with leashed animals or with a JV team. We’re dealing with a threat to western civilization. During the debate last week, I stated that we should not admit those claiming to be Syrian refugees and was condemned by the left for that position. I was right and the events in Paris affirm that. Even the far left and politically correct government of France has closed its borders. It’s time for a President who will act to protect Americans, not just talk and protect the image of Islam.

I call for the following:

1. Close our borders instead of Guantanamo.

2. Institute an immediate moratorium on admission to those persons from countries where there is strong presence of ISIS or Al-Qaeda.

3. Build a coalition that will include NATO, Russia, and nations of the Middle East to aggressively destroy ISIS. Nations who refuse to participate will be sanctioned and isolated.

4. Revoke any agreement with Iran regarding their nuclear capacity. Radical Islamists, whether Sunni or Shia, are a clear and present danger to civilization."





Huckabee was not the only candidate whose response was tinged with right-wing sentiments. During the November 14th morning edition of Fox and Friends, Texas Senator Ted Cruz accused President Obama of underestimating the threat of Islamic extremism in the wake of the Paris attacks, even though the President condemned the attacks the day before.
"...these attacks underscore that we are facing an enemy who is fierce, who is relentless, who is at war with us even if our own president does not understand that it is at war with us, and who will not stop until it is defeated. That enemy is radical Islamic terrorism. As long as we have a commander-in-chief unwilling even to utter the words radical Islamic terrorism, we will not have a concerted effort to defeat these radicals before they continue to murder more and more innocents, whether Europeans or Israelis or Americans."
Like Huckabee, Cruz saw the Paris attacks as an example of the problems that erupt from unchecked immigration. He warned Tucker Carlson that if the U.S. accepts Syrian refugees, it could unwittingly allow terrorists onto its soil. Cruz argued that the U.S. should provide "safe haven" for Christian refugees but resettle Muslim refugees in the Middle East.
"You know President Obama and Hillary Clinton’s idea that we should bring tens of thousands of Syria Muslim refugees to America is nothing less than lunacy.  If you look at the early waves of refugees that have flooded into Europe, one estimate was that 77% of those refugees were young men. That’s a very odd demographic for a refugee wave. The director of national intelligence here in America has said of those refugees in Europe, it is clear that a significant number of them may well be ISIS terrorists.

It makes no sense whatsoever for us to be bringing in refugees who our intelligence cannot determine if they are terrorists here to kill us or not. Those who are fleeing persecution should be resettled in the Middle East in majority Muslim countries. Now on the other hand, Christians who are being targeted for genocide, for persecution, Christians that are being beheaded or crucified, we should be providing safe haven to them."
Other voices used recent events in Paris to blast President Obama as well. In a column at World Net Daily entitled "A Dance of Death in the West", Michael Savage mocks President Obama as a "Caesar" who supposedly fails to grasp the gravity of the extremist threat.
"There is a dance of death in the West and actual death in the Middle East, courtesy of the Islamofascists. Meanwhile, the Caesar in the White House entertains himself with a thousand sycophants, partying on behind closed doors as if the Islamofascist hand will not touch him. He thinks he’s protected from this new plague, the Black Death of radical Islam.

[...]

This is a barbaric revolution, and we have a man in the White House who denies its existence. But whether he chooses to acknowledge it or not, it’s going to continue until someone puts a stop to it."
Still other voices used the tragedy as an opportunity to decry the world's alleged impiety. One American church leader living near Paris argued that society has descended into "moral decadence", resulting in God's removal of his protection. In a commentary piece at Charisma entitled "3 Ways to Pray for Paris After Deadly Terrorist Attacks", Robert Baxter told readers that he and his loved ones were praying for three things in the wake of the Paris attacks.
"We are praying for God's great mercy and compassion to be poured out on those who have lost a family member, friend, colleague. We are praying for this evil to be turned into a wave of salvation for the French.

God has told us that there are other terrorist cells active in France; and we are praying that they would be exposed to the authorities and dealt with adequately.

And finally, we believe God has called us to repent for the silence of the church as our society has slid into moral decadence. We believe that the "normalization" of immorality has destroyed God's protection over our nation. And He is calling us to repent."
Would it really be so hard to hold off on political sniping and decrying "decadence" until more time has passed? Can we please grieve for the victims instead of using their deaths to score political points?


To read additional commentary, visit the following links.

Associated Press: Santorum uses Paris attacks to criticize Clinton

Media Matters: Right-Wing Media Immediately Criticize Obama After He Condemned Paris Attacks

CNN: Cruz ties Paris attacks to religious liberty pitch


Monday, November 9, 2015

Freedom 2015: Cruz, Jindal, and Huckabee Woo the Religious Right


To read an introduction to Freedom 2015, click here. To read about Kevin Swanson at Freedom 2015, click here. To read about Geoffrey Botkin's talk, click here and here.

Freedom 2015: The National Religious Liberties Conference took place on November 6-7 in Des Moines, Iowa. Three Republican presidential candidates -- Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee -- spoke at the event alongside controversial radio host Kevin Swanson. Freedom 2015 offered the candidates an opportunity to woo Religious Right voters with talk of "religious liberty" and "judicial tyranny".

The three candidates seemed unfazed by the event's homophobic, sexist, and Christian reconstructionist speakers. To boot, the organizer's history of vicious anti-gay remarks failed to serve as a red flag for the candidates, despite a petition from People for the American Way urging the candidates to denounce Swanson's bigotry. In the wake of Swanson's deranged rants, I wonder if the three candidates regret attending the event.





In the days leading up to the event, Cruz was evasive about his ties to Kevin Swanson. At the 14:53 mark of this video, CNN's Jake Tapper asks Cruz about Swanson during an interview on The Lead with Jake Tapper, but Cruz changed the subject.
TAPPER: You are speaking at a conference this weekend, the National Religious Liberty Conference in Des Moines. It's organized by a guy named Kevin Swanson. You've been very outspoken about what you deem liberal intolerance of Christians, but Kevin Swanson has said some very inflammatory things about gays and lesbians. He believes Christians should hold up signs at gay weddings, holding up the Leviticus verse instructing the faithful to put gays to death because what they do is an abomination. I don't hold you responsible for what other people say, but given your concern about liberal intolerance, are you not in some ways endorsing conservative intolerance?

CRUZ: Listen, I don't know what this gentleman has said and what he hasn't said. I know that when it comes to religious liberty, this is a passion of mine that has been a passion of mine for decades, and that I have been fighting for religious liberty for everyone ... In the last six and a half years under the Obama administration, we have seen an assault on religious liberty from the federal government.
I'm surprised that Cruz knew nothing about Swanson's homophobia. Why wouldn't a political candidate do his research before a major public appearance? What presidential campaign fails to vet events and allies?





When Cruz appeared on-stage with Swanson at Freedom 2015, he insisted that a U.S. president must be religious. In an excerpt of his speech captured by Right Wing Watch, he had this to say.
SWANSON: How important [is it] for the resident of the United States to fear God, and what does that mean to you?

CRUZ: Any president who doesn't begin every day on his knees isn't fit to be commander in chief of this country.





Bobby Jindal spouted right-wing talking points at the summit as well. In this Right Wing Watch video, Jindal waxed poetic about religious freedom, pitted religious freedom against LGBTQ equality, and warned listeners that the IRS would be targeting Christians.
Look, the IRS could be coming after churches and pastors next. We can't simply say, 'Well, it doesn't impact me, 'cause I'm not a baker, I'm not a caterer, I'm not a musician.' They're coming after those of us that want to live our lives according to our Christian faith. 

It shouldn't take a governor's executive order to protect our First Amendment rights. The Founding Fathers put this in the Constitution on purpose. They understood that America did not create religious liberty. Religious liberty created the United States of America. There's no freedom of association or freedom of speech without religious liberty, so when the left tries to take God out of the public square, we need to remind them [that] the Founding Fathers ... got something profoundly right. Government is not what makes America great. Government doesn't create our rights. The Founding Fathers were creating a limited government to secure but not create our God-given rights ... No earthly court can change the definition of marriage. No federal government, no ACLU should be able to take away our religious liberty rights. We were given those by God Almighty.





Finally, Mike Huckabee refused to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. In an excerpt of his talk captured by Right Wing Watch, Huckabee admitted that if elected president, he would not acknowledge the Supreme Court's decision as law.
SWANSON: As Christians, we are concerned about two important Supreme Court rulings: Roe v. Wade in 1973, and then this year, Obergefell. How in the world can we reverse these horrific rulings at the Supreme Court of the United States? What can the president do about it?

HUCKABEE: Well the first thing the president ought to do is exactly what he should do, and that's uphold the Constitution. The courts can't make law, and if the president surrenders the entire executive branch power to the judicial, he has surrendered to the doctrine of judicial supremacy, which leads us to what Jefferson, Madison, Jackson, and Lincoln all called judicial tyranny. So here's what the president should do, and if I were president, this is what I would do. On the same-sex marriage decision, I would simply say it is not law. It is not law because the people's elected representatives have not made it law, and there is nothing in the Constitution that gives the Supreme Court the power to make a law. They are the Supreme Court. They are not the supreme branch or the supreme being. They can't make law!
These are some of the GOP candidates who want to be president of the United States: a senator who conflates religiosity with presidential competence, a governor who feeds the Religious Right's persecution complex, and a former governor who would ignore Supreme Court decisions he disliked. These three candidates do not understand what real religious liberty entails and do not represent Americans outside the fundamentalist Christian bubble. Voters, take note.


To read additional commentary, visit the following links.

Warren Throckmorton: Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal, and Mike Huckabee and the Alternative Reality Conference

Religion Dispatches: “Ready to Be Arrested?”: GOP Prez Candidates Show Up For Freedom 2015

The Daily Beast: Jesus Freaks Huddle For The Gaypocalypse


Sunday, November 8, 2015

Freedom 2015: Kevin Swanson Comes Unglued



To read an introduction to Freedom 2015, click here. To read about Cruz, Jindal, and Huckabee at Freedom 2015, click here. To read about Geoffrey Botkin's talk, click here and here.

The Freedom 2015 conference took place on November 6-7 in Des Moines, Iowa, drawing over 1,600 attendees, according to WHO 13 TV. Sponsored by Kevin Swanson's Generations with Vision, Samaritan Ministries, Heritage Defense, and other Religious Right groups, Freedom 2015 included appearances by Republican presidential candidates Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, and Bobby Jindal. The conference focused on supposed assaults on Christian "religious liberty", with special emphasis on the LGBTQ rights movement as an alleged threat.

Right Wing Watch and Brian Tashman were kind enough to live-tweet the event, which featured Botkin books, homophobic pamphlets, an array of Religious Right speakers, and a schedule full of workshops on alleged "religious persecution".

Progressives took notice of Freedom 2015's right-wing themes and dubious speakers. The summit came under fire by People for the American Way, who posted a petition urging Cruz, Huckabee, and Jindal to condemn Kevin Swanson's vicious homophobia. One Iowa, an LGBTQ rights organization, hosted a counter-event on November 7th, entitled "America’s First Freedom 2015: A Civil Conversation", a forum to discuss "religious liberty as envisioned by our founders" and counteract "self-serving versions that encourage and sanctify discrimination". (Hat tip to the Des Moines Register.)

I will discuss the speeches of Cruz, Huckabee, and Jindal in a future post, but first, I'd like to share some Freedom 2015 quotes from Kevin Swanson. With Kevin Swanson at the helm, Freedom 2015 quickly devolved into a circus. Swanson paced back and force on stage, screaming about hell and repentance as if on the verge of tears. Swanson's rants not only dripped with homophobia but also included bizarre comments about cow manure, pus-filled sores, children's movies, and country music. By appearing on stage with Swanson and failing to condemn his extremism, Cruz, Huckabee, and Jindal have torpedoed whatever slim chance they might have had of being viable presidential candidates.





For example, in a Freedom 2015 excerpt captured by Right Wing Watch, Swanson claimed that he would sit in cow manure outside a church if one of his children entered a same-sex marriage, then warned the audience not to carve happy faces into infected sores (!?).
"I was thinking, you know, there are parents -- and this is not a funny thing -- there are families whose -- and we are talking Christian families, pastors' families, elders' families in good godly churches. Their sons are rebelling, hanging out with homosexuals and getting married, and the parents are invited. What would you do if that was the case? Here's what I would do. Sackcloth and ashes at the entrance to the church, and I'd sit in cow manure, and I'd spread it all over my body. That's what I would do. And I'm not kidding. I'm not laughing. I'm grieving, I'M MOURNING! I'M POINTING OUT THE PROBLEM! It's not a gay time! These are the people with the sores, the gaping sores, the sores that are pussy and gross, and people are coming in and carving happy faces on the sores. That's not a nice thing to do! DON'T YOU DARE CARVE HAPPY FACES ON OPEN, PUSSY SORES! Don't you ever do that!"





In another Right Wing Watch clip, Swanson raged against abortion for allegedly killing billions of human beings. He saved his hottest rage for the Harry Potter franchise, How to Train Your Dragon, and Kacey Musgraves' "Follow Your Arrow" because they allegedly normalize homosexuality. Unfortunately, this was not the first time Swanson had made ridiculous comments about arts and culture.
"Friends, we are on the very cusp of judgment, as I see it, and we need to call America to repent. As you say, repentance from what? Repentance from defying the Almighty. Repentance of abortion, repentance of the hundreds of millions of dead bodies. I don't know how many children have been aborted by way of abortifacients, by way of the surgical abortion since the 1960s, but I do believe that Margaret Sanger is responsible for more deaths in the world than any single person who has ever lived, and I'm talking about billions of little babies thanks to the technology she developed in the 1960s.

Friends, it's us! The problem is us! We call the nation to repentance today. Repent America! ... America, repent of Harry Potter! America, repent of How to Train Your Dragon! America, repent that Dumbledore emerged as a homosexual mentor for Harry Potter, that Hiccup's mentor in How to Train Your Dragon emerged as a homosexual himself in order that history might repeat itself one more time, in order that little six and seven, eight year-olds might stumble, in order that tens of millions of parents, it would be better for them that a millstone be hanged around their neck and they'd be drowned at the bottom of the sea, in order that there would be so many people stumbling so many children in public schools, in movie theaters, in homes, in which children are raised to be stumbled by the Dumbledores and the mentors of Hiccup in How to Train Your Dragon!

My friends, AMERICA NEEDS TO REPENT! AMERICA NEEDS TO REPENT of her culture! America needs to repent. Country music stations need to repent of playing the song "Follow Your Arrow" ... THESE RADIO STATIONS NEED TO REPENT OR THEY WILL BE DAMNED BY THE ALMIGHTY, BY GOD HIMSELF!"





In a particularly offensive excerpt captured by Right Wing Watch, Swanson argued that the Bible commands death for the "sin" of homosexuality. It was not the first time Swanson has made such a statement.
"There are instances in which both the Old Testament and the New Testament speak to the matter with unbelievable clarity, and friends--and this is the highest level, the very highest level of clarity, where the word of God has spoken. Both Old Testament and New Testament. Ought not to be any debate whatsoever about it, and you know what that sin is. It's the sin of homosexuality. Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 6, 1 Timothy I think it's chapter 4, and of course Leviticus 18 and Leviticus 20. The word of God speaks there, both, and in fact, [in] Romans 1, Paul affirms that this particular sin is worthy of death, in Romans 1. So, granted, there are varying levels of clarity/relevance relating to ethics, but still, the Old Testament and New Testament I believe both speak with authority, and we ought to receive it."





With regards to whether the U.S. should execute LGBTQ persons, Swanson was evasive. In one Right Wing Watch clip, he argued that mass repentance for sexual "sins" (homosexuality, adultery, divorce, and porn consumption) was of far greater urgency.
"Yes, Leviticus 20:13 calls for the death penalty for homosexuals. Yes, [in] Romans 1:32, the apostle Paul does say that homosexuals are worthy of death. HIS WORDS, NOT MINE! AND I AM NOT ASHAMED OF THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST! And I am not ashamed of the truth of the word of God, and I AM WILLING TO GO TO JAIL for standing on the truth on the word of God! And I know I've taken the counsel. Many have told me this weekend, 'You be careful. You choose your words carefully. We have presidentials coming down to this conference this weekend.' I understand that, but I AM NOT ASHAMED OF THE TRUTH OF THE WORD OF GOD, and I'm willing to go to jail for it.

Then they ask me, 'Yes, but do you advocate for our civil leaders to do this today?' And my answer is no. But why? Here's why. Because that's not such a big deal. We are not to fear those who can kill the body. Yea, Jesus says fear rather the one who can cast body and soul in hell forever.

The discussion concerning the capital punishment of homosexuals is nothing, is not all that important when contrasted with hellfire forever. You say why wouldn't you call for it? I say it's because we need some time for homosexuals to repent. That's why ...

There is not much difference between adultery and homosexuality as conveyed by the word of God. There's not much difference between adultery and divorcees who themselves have committed adultery by illegitimate divorce or remarriage. There is hardly any difference. They need TIME TO REPENT, DO YOU UNDERSTAND? AMERICA NEEDS TIME TO REPENT! YOU SAY, WHY DON'T YOU CALL FOR IT? AMERICA NEEDS TIME TO REPENT of their homosexuality, their adultery, and their porn addictions, and I'm speaking of 80% of young men who, according to Barna research last year, have confessed to a porn addiction, to at least weekly or monthly involvement in pornography, an addiction that, my friends, constitutes such a porneia that as I see it, they are not qualified to even marry.
America's steeped in a destructive form of sexuality, and friends, THEY'RE BOUND FOR HELL! DO YOU UNDERSTAND? It's not so much an issue of the death penalty; it's an issue of God's judgment that's hanging upon this nation today."
Swanson's howling, his palpable fear and rage, his paranoia about being incarcerated, and his ongoing obsession with sexual "sins" all made me squirm. This was not a pundit making outlandish statements just to score political points; this was a man seized with terror, loathing, and morbid obsessions. Something is very, very wrong with this man, I thought as I watched him scream.

Swanson's statements bring the madness of the Religious Right into sharper focus. Screaming aside, his dismay at the state of the world echoes the Religious Right's dismay at 21st century life. People who cling to patriarchy, heteronormativity, and Christian hegemony now find themselves disoriented as women, LGBTQ people, and religious minorities assert their rights. Their disorientation gives way to anger and fear as they find themselves unable or unwilling to adapt to the new world.

And so Swanson and his ilk lash out. They lash out at women who exercise their reproductive rights. They lash out at LGBTQ people, demonizing them as worthy of death. They lash out at church-state separation, wailing about "religious persecution" as they persecute others. As their hegemony weakens, their rhetoric becomes more fevered and outrageous.

Swanson's rants at Freedom 2015 magnified what we've know about the Religious Right for years: they're angry, they're hateful, and they're disconnected from reality. We must counteract the Religious Right's efforts, especially in the political realm, for that reason.


To read additional commentary, visit the following links.

Towleroad: ‘Kill the Gays’ Pastor Says ‘We Are Messed Up’, Proves It with Epic Meltdown

Jezebel: Spitting and Sweating, Anti-Gay Pastor Kevin Swanson Welcomes Huckabee and Jindal to Weird, Weird Conference

The New Civil Rights Movement: Christian Pastor Says Gays 'Worthy Of Death' At Conference With 3 GOP Presidential Candidates

The Frisky: What If Bernie And Hillary Spoke At An Event With People Who Wanted To Kill Christians?


Tuesday, November 3, 2015

GOP Candidates to Speak at Right-Wing "Religious Liberty" Conference

Freedom2015 Trailer from Kevin Swanson on Vimeo.



To read about Kevin Swanson at Freedom 2015, click here. To read about Cruz, Jindal, and Huckabee at Freedom 2015, click here. To read about Geoffrey Botkin's talk, click here and here.

Freedom 2015: The National Religious Liberties Conference will take place in Des Moines, Iowa on November 6-7. The conference, sponsored by Kevin Swanson's Generations with Vision show and other Religious Right groups, will be a two-day summit on alleged threats to Christians' religious freedom in the U.S.

The conference website overflows with bombastic rhetoric about the supposed threats of religious persecution. Predictably, it conflates victories for LGBTQ rights with subjugation of Christians, as if LGBTQ equality and religious liberty were diametrically opposed. It argues that the 2016 presidential election will be vital for the struggle for "religious freedom". 
The 2016 elections will be definitive. For Christians, religious liberties will be the issue.
  • The Supreme Court of the United States recently legalized homosexual marriage in all 50 states in the Obergefell V. Hodges decision. Are you ready to face persecution for opposing the homosexual agenda?
  • The Supreme Court let stand the New York City ban on religious meetings in public buildings in March, 2015. Are churches ready for eviction?
  • The Supreme Court let stand the lower court ruling against the New Mexico photographer who refused a “gay” wedding in April, 2014.
  • Religious freedom bills in Indiana and Kentucky went down in flames in April, 2015.
American Christians are concerned. According to Pew Research, the minority group fearing persecution more than any others: evangelical protestants, a group representing some 35 million Americans. They are concerned about their jobs in a politically-correct work environment, their businesses, their churches, their marriage licenses, their parental freedoms.

International persecution against Christians has reached epidemic levels. They are the most persecuted religious group in the world, and Christians need to know how to respond.
The website strives to instill fear in attendees, warning them that a wicked state will persecute believers and snatch their children away. The fact that none of this is actually happening doesn't seem to faze them.
Americans, get ready for the gathering storm!

These are serious questions ... are you read for this?

Are you ready ... to lose your children to the state?

Is your pastor ready to go to jail for refusing to officiate a same sex marriage?

Will your church be shut down?

Will Christians be forced to break the law?
Right Wing Watch reports that Republican presidential candidates Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, and Bobby Jindal will speak at the summit. The three candidates seem to have no problem with speaking at an event organized by Kevin Swanson, a Christian Patriarchy adherent with a long, outrageous history of misogynist and homophobic statements.

Other conference speakers include Religious Right voices such as Kevin Swanson, Geoff Botkin, Bill Jack, Rafael Cruz, Jan Mickelson, Bob Vander Plaats, Aaron and Melissa Klein, and Richard and Betty Odgaard. Many of the event's speakers have histories of homophobic comments and, in the case of the Kleins and Odgaards, anti-LGBTQ discrimination.

If the conference's schedule is any indication, Freedom 2015 will depict fundamentalist Christians as a persecuted community. Attendees can enjoy lunch with the Benham Brothers, praised by the website for "standing for the sake of faith in Christ ... no matter what the cost!" The workshop offerings are exactly what you'd expect.
  • Freedom: Why Christians Should Engage the Battle for Liberty

  • Child Protective Services: One of the Greatest Threats to Your Religious Freedom

  • Why Christians Must Defend Marriage in Family, Church, and State

  • Targeted: Men & Women Persecuted for the Christian Faith

  • Crushing Leviathan: Biblical Principles to Break Free of the Modern Inquisition

  • Securing Religious Liberty Starts at the State Capitols

  • The Decline of Freedom: From the Bill of Rights to the Ten Planks of Communism, America's Domestic Enemies and Where They Came From
I eagerly wait to hear how Cruz, Huckabee, and Jindal will appeal to Religious Right voters at Freedom 2015. If their speeches enchant Christian fundamentalists, they will no doubt alienate moderate voters and make the three candidates even less viable.


To read additional commentary, visit the following links.

The New Civil Rights Movement: Guess Which GOP Presidential Candidates Will Join Pastor Who Thinks Gays Deserve Death?

Gawker: Three GOP Candidates Join Pastor Who Thinks Frozen Turns Kids Gay

The Frisky: GOP Presidential Contenders To Party With “Kill The Gays” Pastor



Mike Huckabee and Jan Mickelson on Slavery

Some Religious Right voices, especially Christian Reconstructionist voices, have defended slavery as a Biblically-sanctioned practice. Religious Right figures such as R.J. Rushdoony, Doug Wilson and Joe Morecraft have come under fire for their comments about slavery. Now, a right-wing radio host and a Republican presidential candidate have defended slavery, which should disgust anyone with a conscience.

During the October 14th edition of Mickelson in the Morning, Jan Mickelson and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee defended slavery for criminals. (Hat tip to Freak Out Nation.) At the 19:26 mark, Mickelson criticized the "pagan" U.S. criminal justice system for incarcerating criminals instead of enslaving them. Citing Exodus, he advocated for the enslavement of criminals who cannot pay restitution for thefts.
"Slowly the pagans took over our criminal justice system and began making excuses for criminals, and we send people to jail to make them better, which it doesn't. The point of departure from our system to what real justice is is ancient. And let me read from you from the most ancient law about this. This is from the book of Exodus. It's an Old Testament book in the Torah, the part of the law of the Bible. Here's Exodus 22, direct quote. 'Anyone who steals must certainly make restitution.'

Now that is about as a blanket statement of a principled law as you're going to get under any circumstances. It doesn't take into account if they were rich and stealing or they're poor and stealing or if they're destitute and stealing,  they're homeless or a druggie or a newcomer or a refugee or somebody who works in Wall Street. Anybody who steals must certainly make restitution.

Well here's the anticipation here. 'Well, what if they don't have any money?' ... This law, Old Testament, Book of Exodus 22:2 says this ... 'But, if they have nothing--' And that's the case in many, many cases in the current situation. Somebody's a con artist or they're a thief or they're a druggie and they're living in a hovel or under a bridge but they steal to support their habits. They have nothing. So, what are you going to do with those people? Well, we just sweep them up, lock them up, put them in a jail, and bill the taxpayers for their keep.

But the Old Testament law says, 'But if they have nothing, they must be sold to pay for their theft.' What do you mean sold? ... If we had a truly functioning criminal justice system, [that person] would be taken to a slave market or a restitution market and her sorry keister would be sold to the highest bidder, where she would work for them, being productive and earning for productivity, and the cost and the money that is paid for her sorry keister would go to pay part of that restitution."
First, in his haste to subjugate thieves, Mickelson ignored other disturbing parts of the passage he quoted. Exodus 22 also commands capital punishment for witches and those who worship foreign gods. Does Mickelson want the U.S. to institute those practices too?

Second, Mickelson misrepresented slavery in the Bible, sugar-coating a brutal institution. Old Testament slavery was not a means of enforcing restitution for crime, but a cruel form of labor bondage and sexual servitude. Slave-owners purchased slaves as chattel (Leviticus 25:44-46) or captured them in war (I Chronicles 5:18-22; II Chronicles 28:6-8). Warriors captured foreign women and enslaved them for sexual use (Numbers 31:1-18). Even children were forced into bondage (Deuteronomy 20:13-14). Slave-owners could torture their slaves short of immediate death (Exodus 21:20-21) and hold a male slave's family hostage to coerce him to remain in bondage (Exodus 21:2-6). In short, Old Testament slavery was a violent and exploitative institution that has no place in the 21st century.

The New Testament paints an unpleasant picture of slavery as well. In Matthew 25:14-30, God's relationship to humans is likened to a master's relationship with slaves. In one parable, a slave refuses to invest his owner's money, paralyzed with fear of his "hard" master, only to be berated and thrown outside in the dark. 1 Peter 2:18-25 commands slaves to submit to harsh slave-owners and applauds slaves who persevere "under the pain of unjust suffering". Even in the New Testament, slavery was a oppressive institution, one that should not be replicated in a 21st century democracy.*

Mickelson insisted that he was not championing "chattel slavery", but rather a nicer form of slavery at the 23:15 mark. He mocked Media Matters for America for drawing attention to his defense of slavery earlier this year.
"Now before some idiot from Media Matters suggests I'm advocating slavery again, like they did before, like they totally misunderstood something I said and embellished the heck out of it ... This is the 13th Amendment. Slavery is immoral. Slavery is illegal. That is chattel slavery, putting to somebody to work for you simply by force, gun, is immoral and illegal. Making people and indenturing people who are criminals is not. Even you guys at Media Matters should be able to understand the difference. What I'm talking about and what the book of Exodus was talking about is not chattel slavery."
No sell, Jan. First, the Bible does condone chattel slavery, as shown by the Biblical passages quotes above. Second. by definition, slavery is the reduction of human beings to chattel. Because it reduces people to property, slavery is intrinsically dehumanizing and cannot be made ethical. Finally, if Mickelson thinks indentured servitude is kosher, he would do well to familiarize himself with the Peonage Act of 1867, which outlawed peonage.

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee was a guest on Mickelson's radio show that day, and he agreed with Mickelson's slavery comments. At the 43:45 mark, the two men discussed criminal justice, restitution, and slavery.
MICKELSON: Our criminal justice system has been taken over by progressives, just like our failed government education system has been, and they've turned it into sort of a combination criminal store, where we store people we don't want around us for years, then we bill the taxpayers for that ... I'm thinking that jails are a pagan invention. I was reading from Exodus to listeners during the last segment. It said if a person steals, they have to pay it back, maybe two-fold, four-fold. If they don't have anything, we're supposed to take them down and sell them.

HUCKABEE: [Laughs]

MICKELSON: That's what it says in Exodus. We sell them and they are indentured. That's what the 13th Amendment says for criminal restitution. We indenture them and they have to spend their time not sitting on their stump in a jail cell. They're supposed to be working off the debt. Wouldn't that be a better choice?

HUCKABEE: Well, it really would be. Look, my prison director in Arkansas used to say, and I quote him often, 'We lock a lot of people up because we're mad at them, not because we're afraid of them.' And we need to lock people up we're afraid of, but sometimes the best way to deal with a nonviolent criminal behavior is what you just suggested. Make them pay back, pay back more than they stole. Let it be an example.
The men's flippant discussion of slavery disgusted me. Yes, the U.S. criminal justice system is flawed, with inefficient courts, brutal prisons, and insufficient strategies for reforming criminals. However, Americans can only rectifying the problem by reforming the criminal justice system, not by replacing it with an even crueler institution. Unjust practices will not bring us justice.

We should be horrified by the Religious Right's contempt for human rights, as evidenced by figures such as Huckabee and Mickelson who defend slavery. Have Mickelson and Huckabee learned nothing from the ugly history of slavery in the U.S., to say nothing of slavery in world history?

I suspect that these attitudes are rooted in self-righteous contempt for supposedly "lesser" members of society, whose humanity the Religious Right is loathe to recognize. Slavery apologists see themselves as better than those whom they would enslave (criminals, addicts, undocumented immigrants, etc.), and thus do not recognize them as fellow human beings with the same rights. Disturbing attitudes such as these spring from the Religious Right's contempt for "sinners", belief in Biblical inerrancy, and obsession with rigid hierarchy.

Remember, these comments were uttered by a man who is running for the presidency of the United States. Even if Huckabee's chances of winning are slim, we should still pay attention when his ilk seek political power. We simply cannot allow figures with such low opinions of human rights to gain power.


To read additional commentary, visit the following links.

Think Progress: Huckabee Suggests Poor People Should Be Sold Into Slavery For Stealing

Raw Story: Huckabee agrees with pro-slavery radio host: Sell poor criminals as property instead of jailing them

The Frisky: Mike Huckabee Thinks Replacing Prison With Slavery Is A Swell Idea


* I recommend the book Slavery in Early Christianity for those who want to learn more about slavery in the New Testament and the early Christian community.


Saturday, September 19, 2015

The Kim Davis Saga Continues After Clerk Released from Jail




As discussed in a prior post, U.S. District Judge David Bunning had Rowan County (Kentucky) clerk Kim Davis taken into custody earlier this month because of her repeated refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Davis was found to be in contempt of court and incarcerated at the Carter County Detention Center in Kentucky.

The Religious Right was outraged, lionizing Davis as a martyr for "traditional" marriage and Christian values. For example, protesters converged outside of Bunning's home to demand the release of Kim Davis. Approximately thirty people protested outside of Bunning's house in Fort Thomas, Kentucky on September 7th, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer. Protesters brandished homophobic signs, including one that cited Leviticus 18:22 and others that read "Don't Make a Moral Wrong a Civil Right!"

At one point, the radical Oath Keepers made an offer of protection to Davis. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes condemned Bunning for supposedly overstepping his authority and violating Kim Davis' rights. In a September 9th statement, Rhodes offered to protect Davis from similar infringements. (Hat tip to Right Wing Watch.)
"We believe Federal District Court Judge David Bunning grossly overstepped his bounds and violated Mrs Davis’ due process rights, and in particular her right to a jury trial.  This judge has assumed unto himself not just the powers of all three branches of government, but has also taken on the powers of judge, jury, and “executioner.”  What matters to us is not whether you agree with her position on gay marriage or her decision to not issue marriage licenses.  What matters is that the judge is violating the Constitution in his anger and desire to punish her for going against his will ... We must stand against this.  And so we will protect her and prevent it from happening again."
Davis' legal team declined the offer of protection from Oath Keepers, and thus Oath Keepers canceled their planned security detail. Given the Oath Keeper's reputation, this was a smart move on behalf of her legal team.

Several days after Davis' incarceration, the parties involved reached a truce. According to CNN, Bunning ordered Davis released from jail, on the condition that she refrain from interfering with the issuing of marriage licenses by her deputies. Davis left the Carter County Detention Center on September 8th and appeared at a rally held in her honor in front of the jail. According to LEX 18, several schools closed on September 8th due to expected traffic congestion from the rally.

Flanked by her husband Joe Davis, Mat Staver, and Mike Huckabee, Davis greeted the jubilant rally crowd. Crosses and signs, including a yellow poster board that read "Supreme Court = The New ISIS of America!", floated above the audience. According to TMZ, Davis greeted the crowd as Survivor's "Eye of the Tiger" played in the background, which angered Survivor's Frankie Sullivan. Should've asked permission first, I thought.

Davis praised God and applauded Christians for rallying behind her cause in a video clip captured by CNN.
"I just want to give God the glory. His people have rallied, and you are a strong people! We serve a living God who knows exactly where each and every one of us is at. Just keep on pressing. Don't let down, because he is here."






After Davis left the stage, Huckabee depicted anti-LGBTQ Christians as a persecuted population who might be arrested for their beliefs at any time. Raw Story posted a video of Huckabee's comments from MSNBC's coverage of the rally.
"All of us need to ask: who's next? Your pastor? The head of a school? Who's next? My question as we leave here today: will you be ready to take the stand even at expense to yourself to stand firm for your convictions, for the Constitution and for your faith and will not waver nor fall? God bless you! Thank you for being here today!"






In another rally excerpt captured by Right Wing Watch, Mike Huckabee blasted the Supreme Court for its alleged "judicial tyranny" in permitting same-sex marriage. He attributed Kim Davis' defiance to God, praising God for allowing America to come into being.
"Our founders were so concerned that they said that should we ever come to the place that we allow a court to run amok of its purpose that we would be living under what is no less than judicial tyranny. That's why we gather today. It is far more than one clerk saying she will not issue marriage licenses. It's that every one of us will have to decide whether or not we want to keep this great republic or whether we're willing to sacrifice it and surrender it to tyranny. And I think we gather here today to say, 'We will not surrender to the tyranny of one branch of government!'.

I do not think that it is possible to explain America apart from the providence of Almighty God. There is no other explanation for how this country could have come into being. There is no other explanation for how this country could have been sustained. The only explanation is that God intervened, and I believe this week, once again, as Forest Gump so wonderfully said, 'God showed up'. And he showed up in the form of an elected democrat named Kim Davis."






In another Right Wing Watch video, Brian Brown from the National Organization for Marriage likened same-sex marriage to slavery and idol worship. He flatly refused to acknowledge same-sex marriage as a legally sanctioned right, calling it "the supreme lie of the land".
"Christians are good citizens. We pay our taxes. We want to obey just authority. But throughout history, when unjust laws have been promulgated and put forward, when we are told 'choose, choose between your maker and the state', when we are told to bow down to pagan idols in early Rome, when we were told to support the slave trade in England, when we were told, abolitionists were told, 'Well hey, Dred Scott's the law! You have to go along!' What did we do? Did we obey? [Crowd shouts "No!"]

We need to know where we come from. We stood up for truth against state power time and time again. We know in our hearts, we know in our minds that same-sex marriage is not the supreme law of the land. It is the supreme lie of the land."
Following Davis' release, Liberty Counsel issued a statement depicting Davis as a martyr who was persecuted for her religious beliefs.
"Judge Bunning issued an order this afternoon ordering that Kim Davis be released from the custody of the U.S. Marshals. She has been held at the Carter County Detention Center since last Thursday where she had been sentenced to jail for exercising her sincerely-held religious beliefs.

Kim can never recover the past six days of her life spent in an isolated jail cell, where she was incarcerated like a common criminal because of her conscience and religious convictions. She is now free to return to her family, her coworkers and the office where she has faithfully served for the past 27 years."
Initially, the matter seemed settled. Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway did not plan to launch an investigation into Davis' actions, according to Pink News. Davis was supposed to resume her job without incident. Naturally, Davis couldn't leave well enough alone.

First, Davis complained that she was allegedly being forced to disobey God by permitting her office to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, according to the Associated Press. When Davis returned to work at the Rowan County Courthouse the morning of September 17th, she insisted that licenses issued by her office would be "unauthorized".

Soon thereafter, Davis reportedly removed her name from marriage forms and made deputy clerk Brian Mason initial the forms instead of signing them. The Associated Press reports that Davis may have defied Bunning's order by altering marriage license forms to remove her name. If so, she could find herself in more legal hot water over her dereliction of duty.

Davis' obstructive behavior has already earned her legal hassles and jail time, and yet she remains recalcitrant. Instead of dealing with the matter gracefully by either granting same-sex marriage licenses or resigning, she continues her homophobic crusade. Davis' actions may lionize her in the eyes of the Religious Right, but they show her to be an obstructionist homophobe in the eyes of most Americans.


For additional commentary, visit the following links.

Huffington Post: Kim Davis: Canary in the Coal Mine Called Theocracy

What Would JT Do? Kim Davis speaks at Huckabee’s rally. Have puke bucket nearby.

Right Wing Watch: Staver: Requiring Kim Davis To Do Her Job Is Like Forcing Her 'To Grant A License To Sodomize Children"

Americans United for Separation of Church and State: Kim Davis Should Go Back To Jail If She Interferes With Deputy Clerks’ Ability To Issue Marriage Licenses 



Saturday, September 5, 2015

Religious Right Reacts to Kim Davis' Incarceration



Kim Davis was recently taken into custody after refusing to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples in her capacity as Rowan County (Kentucky) clerk. Predictably, the Religious Right is enraged, depicting Davis as a martyr for religious freedom. The fact that Davis' religious beliefs do not absolve her of the responsibility to perform her job escapes them.

First, in an August 13th statement, Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver defended Davis while sneering at the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. In Staver's eyes, Davis' job responsibilities were changed by "five lawyers" who exceeded their authority. "Kim Davis did not sign up as a clerk to issue same-sex marriage licenses," he wrote. "Her job duty was changed by five lawyers without any constitutional authority. At a minimum, her religious convictions should be accommodated."
"Judge Bunning’s decision equated Kim’s free exercise of religion to going to church. This is absurd! Christianity is not a robe you take off when you leave a sanctuary ... The First Amendment guarantees Kim and every American the free exercise of religion, even when they are working for the government."
With no hint of irony, Concerned Women for America president Penny Nance decried the supposed "lawlessness" of the Supreme Court for putting Kim Davis in jail.
"We support Kim Davis’ right to act according to her conscience and face the consequences.  Her predicament is the direct result of the lawlessness promoted by the Supreme Court of the United States itself with its unconstitutional Obergefell decision. It’s flippant, and frankly insulting, treatment of religious liberty and Obergefell is a disgrace to that great institution.

Same-sex ‘marriage’ supporters are chastising Mrs. Davis now, but they were the same group of people that applauded with glee when public officials forced the granting of marriage certificates to same-sex couples in direct violation to their state constitutions, before the Supreme Court’s decision.  They are not concerned about the law or the constitution but simply want to promote their activism through it.

We believe the law should provide reasonable accommodation to any person who does not want to participate in a same-sex ‘marriage’ union because of their deeply held religious beliefs, as has been done in other areas throughout our history."
Family Research Council president Tony Perkins released a statement warning readers that religious liberty is in "grave danger". Perkins ignores the fact that Americans can still practice their religion freely in favor of a tiresome persecution narrative.
"Today we are witnessing what the four dissenting Supreme Court Justices warned of in the Obergefell decision: religious liberty in America is in grave danger.

While five justices on the Supreme Court created this dilemma, it is incumbent upon Congress, and in this case legislatures, to ensure orthodox religious beliefs are accommodated. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear could solve this court-created conflict by immediately calling for a special legislative session and establishing statutory accommodations for clerks like Kim Davis.

Ultimately, this is about more than same-sex marriage licenses in Kentucky. It is about the ability of Christians and other religious people to serve in positions of public trust. If this is not resolved in a manner that accommodates the orthodox religious beliefs of Clerk Davis, this will, in effect, establish a reverse religious test barring those who hold biblical views of marriage from positions of public service. Such a religious test by proclamation or practice is wrong.

Now a court is jailing someone over this because the governor failed to act. How hard is it to change a simple form to remove her name from it? Isn't that worth doing to keep someone out of jail because of what they believe? Governor Beshear must call for a special session of the legislature and grant an accommodation to Kim Davis."
Even political leaders chimed in. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal defended Davis in an interview with the Huffington Post, accusing the government of discrimination. The fact that Davis violated the law by discriminating against same-sex couples did not seem to perturb him.
"I don't think anyone should have to choose between following their conscience and religious beliefs and giving up their job and facing financial sanctions. I think it's wrong to force Christian individuals or business owners. We are seeing government today discriminate against whether it's clerks, florists, musicians or others. I think that's wrong. I think you should be able to keep your job and follow your conscience..."
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee has loudly supported Davis. The Associated Press reports that Huckabee plans to visit Davis in jail next week and arrange a rally in support of her cause. In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, he called Davis' incarceration "the first example of the criminalization of a Christian for believing the traditional definition of marriage". Huckabee complained that Davis was "not accommodated for her faith, but was jailed without bail". In another interview with MSNBC, Huckabee blasted the Obergefell v. Hodges decision that triggered the controversy, criticizing the ruling as an affront to God.
"I believe that it's time for us to have a real clear understanding of what should be something that we learned in ninth grade civics, that the Supreme Court is not the supreme branch. It's the Supreme Court, and it certainly is not the supreme being. It cannot overrule the laws of nature and nature's God."
However, not all conservative leaders have defended Davis' actions. Huffington Post and Washington Blade report that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and presidential candidate Carly Fiorina weighed in on the controversy during an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt. Graham admitted that Davis should "comply with the law or resign" in keeping with the rule of law, and Fiorina said that any further defiance of the courts "is not appropriate". Fiorina explained that as an elected county clerk, Davis is expected to act as a arm of the government, and if she is unwilling to do so, she must consider another job.
"...this woman now needs to make a decision of conscience — is she prepared to continue to work for the government, be paid for by the government in which case she needs to execute the government’s will, or does she feel so strongly about this that she wants to sever her employment with the government and go seek employment elsewhere where her religious liberties will be paramount over her duties as a government employee?"
Graham and Fiorina notwithstanding, many right-wing figures are having difficulty understanding that Christian faith does not trump the law. Kim Davis' religious beliefs did not entitle her to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples, despite what the Religious Right believes. Religious liberty is not under threat; Davis is not being persecuted for her faith; and America has not descended into lawlessness. Davis simply refused to do her job.



Sunday, August 23, 2015

Commentary Tidbits

Jezebel: Jehovah's Witness Leader: There's a 'Spiritual Dilemma' in Reporting Sexual Abuse

Right Wing Watch: President Mike Huckabee Will Outlaw Abortion By Executive Fiat

The Advocate: Mike Huckabee's Revival of the 'Social Experiment' Fallacy

Jerks 4 Jesus: Duggar Scandal Bingo

The New Yorker: Josh Duggar’s Ashley Madison Problem


News Tidbits

Salt Lake Tribune: Mormon Leaders Appoint Three Women To Top Church Positions

Huffington Post: Illinois Bans Gay Conversion Therapy For LGBT Youths

Washington Blade: White House ‘pleased’ with Illinois ‘ex-gay’ therapy ban

The Advocate: Groups Ask Obama: Fix Religious Freedom Act

Ynet: Huckabee in Israel: 'Lose the land, lose the peace'

Topeka Capital-Journal: Kris Kobach employee allegedly fired for lack of religious fervor, lawsuit claims

Politico: Planned Parenthood fires back

Raw Story: Tennessee pastor lashes out at ‘liberal society': Stoning gays is part of ‘the mindset of God’

LGBTQ Nation: “Bible-banging homophobe” goes gay for a year — and stops being antigay  

Vice: More than 1,000 Jehovah’s Witnesses Have Been Accused of Child Sex Abuse in Australia — And Police Never Knew


Commentary Tidbits

Boing Boing: Rules for Bible Class

Love, Joy, Feminism: Bill Gothard Explains Road Safety (aka How Not to Get Raped)

Salon: Secrets of the extreme religious right: Inside the frightening world of Christian Reconstructionism

Raw Story: Children as property: The common root of religious child abuse and the pro-life movement

The Guardian: Mike Huckabee blunders his way through Israel press conference 

The Daily Beast: How The Duggars’ Church Encourages Young Women To ‘Submit’

Huffington Post: Conservative Christians Are Still Fighting Gay Marriage, But It's An Uphill Battle Against The Courts

Daily Xtra: Why Korea’s Christian churches are leading the anti-gay charge

Daylight Atheism: Jewish Fundamentalism Is Poisoning Israel