Pages

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Lou Engle, Race, and Slavery

Right Wing Watch recently reported on several conference calls posted at Transformation Michigan, a New Apostolic Reformation group that is promoting intercessory prayer for the state. (See newsite[dot]transformmi[dot]com/) Amidst conference calls with Jerry Boykin, Cindy Jacobs, and other New Apostolic Reformation leaders was a May 17th conference call recording with Lou Engle.

The May 17th call focused heavily on race in America. Engle has discussed race at other recent events as well, including OneThing 2010 and Firestorm 2011, particularly in the context of anti-abortion activism or religious revival.

After discussing TheCall Detroit event (scheduled for November 11th) and the role of the black church in the prayer movement, Engle described a dream involving a dying black man with one eye. At the 16:05 mark, Engle interpreted the dream as such.

"I believe that there has been a whole black American old guard that actually in some measure left its calling when they only embraced civil rights and did not embrace the call to prayer, holiness, the ending of abortion, righteousness, and because of it, our eyes are gone. We lost our sight. But there is a young generation who are secretly getting the message from God. I believe it's the sign ... There is coming a movement of prayer. It's the urban thunder."
Engle recounted the story of Jeremiah 34, in which the residents of Jerusalem freed their slaves, only to enslave them again, causing God to deliver them into the hands of the conquering Babylonians as punishment. At the 20:11 mark, Engle compared Jeremiah 34 to race relations between blacks and whites, urging whites to repent for past racism and blacks to forgive whites.
"I believe in Detroit, I believe we're to free our slaves. Whites must repent from any racism. Number two, blacks must forgive. The black leaders must forgive and empty out the bitterness at the black and the white baggage that we have given to them, or they will not be given the mantle to lead us into a new movement of justice. That has got to happen. You've got to set us free. If you don't forgive the white people, you are actually holding us as slaves."
No, Lou. Holding a grudge is NOTHING like keeping other human beings enslaved and oppressed. In my opinion, the slavery comment was out of line.

To listen to the full conference call recording, visit transformmi[dot]com/archives/768

Monday, May 30, 2011

Pro and Anti-Gay Demonstrators at St. Peter's Church in Chicago

On Friday, May 27th, anti-gay advocates held a rally at St. Peter's Church in Chicago, IL, drawing supporters and detractors from around the region. Organized by anti-abortion group Americans for Life, the rally not only protested an Illinois civil unions measure, but brought attention to the Illinois Defense of Marriage Initiative, which calls for marriage to be legally defined as the union of one man and one woman. Indeed, according to the Windy City Times, Bob Schwartz of the Gay Liberation Network believed that the anti-gay rally was primarily about organizing people around an anti-gay marriage amendment.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Fundamentalism and Genocide

After the capture of former Bosnian Serb army chief Ratko Mladic for alleged war crimes, I've been reflecting on atrocities as of late. Mladic is accused of overseeing the slaughter of 7,500 Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica in 1995, during the ethnic conflict in the former Yugoslavia. Such atrocities should shake us to our core, reminding us of the human capacity for evil, as well as our moral duty to our fellow human beings.

Something in most people cries out against the very idea of genocide, horrified at bloodshed on such a grand scale, at attempts to wipe entire communities from the world. We instinctively label genocide as wrong, stunned that anyone could carry out such atrocities.

2011 CHAP Convention -- Final Thoughts

To read a prior post about Ken Ham's workshops at the 2011 CHAP convention, click here. To read about Doug Phillip's workshops at CHAP, click here and here.

Now that I've summarized some of the 2011 CHAP workshops I attended, I'd like to wrap things up with some general observations about the conference. First, as I waded through the thousands of people in attendance, I took notice of the convention's demographics. The overwhelming majority of attendees I saw were white and (by appearances) middle class. This is neither positive nor negative, but simply an observation. I also noticed a considerable number of Mennonites in attendance, immediately recognizable by their simple clothing and the distinctive head coverings worn by the women. Whether this is because Pennsylvania is home to a sizable Mennonite population, or because Mennonites are disproportionately represented among homeschoolers, I don't know.

In retrospect, I was struck by several common threads that ran through the workshops I attended.

1) Suspicion of mainstream society and non-Christians. Several workshops I attended displayed antipathy toward non-Christians and secular society, heavily laden with us-versus-them thinking. Indeed, some fundamentalist homeschool proponents encourage homeschooling as a means by which Christian parents can "protect" children from these outside influences. For instance, in the workshop "Already Gone", Ken Ham lamented America was becoming more pluralistic, complaining that America has become a nation that trusts many gods. He accused public schools of being against God because they weren't for God, and lambasted textbooks that explain the world through natural processes, which he equated with atheism.

2011 CHAP Convention -- More Zaniness from Doug Phillips

To read a prior post about Ken Ham's workshops at the 2011 CHAP convention, click here. To read a prior post about Doug Phillips' other CHAP workshops, click here. To read concluding thoughts about the CHAP convention, click here.

Have you ever encountered something so alien to your sensibilities that you simply had to share it with others? That's how I felt upon exposure to one of Doug Phillips' workshops at the 2011 CHAP Convention, entitled, "Toxic: Seven Poisons that Threaten the Health of the Homeschool Movement." Overflowing with patriarchal messages, the workshop offered a heavy dose of Christian Patriarchy Movement ideology.

Phillips began the workshop by observing that the Christian homeschool movement has gone through changes over years, celebrating the "pioneers" that God raised up in the early days of the movement who were willing to endure "persecution." Twenty-five years ago, he said, parents were fighting for their right to homeschool children when states weren't clear on their own laws, and some pastors were even "persecuting" homeschoolers.

Phillips listed common denominators among Christian homeschoolers, including the "reformation" of the family, transformation of individuals in the likeness of Jesus, and glorification of the kingdom of God. Another theme of the movement is freedom, he said, with early homeschool advocates arguing that the state had no lawful oversight under the Constitution and the law of God to oversee homeschooling. Homeschooling was also about raising a generation of young men "confident in holy masculinity" and young ladies "confident in holy femininity," which drew applause from the audience.

2011 CHAP Convention -- Doug Phillips

To read a previous post on Ken Ham at the 2011 CHAP Convention, click here. To read about another Doug Phillips workshop at CHAP, click here. To read concluding thoughts on the convention, click here.

While attending the 2011 convention for the Christian Homeschool Association of Pennsylvania (CHAP), I was particularly interested in the workshops of prominent Religious Right voices, including Ken Ham and Doug Phillips. Phillips, president of the Vision Forum (a Christian ministry devoted to the "Biblical family") is remembered for criticizing Sarah Palin's political career on the premise that she violated Biblical gender roles. Angie the Anti-Theist and Julie Ingersoll at Religion Dispatches have posted some amusing commentary on the Vision Forum, which will provide background on Phillips' worldview.

In a Friday morning workshop entitled "Developing a Biblical Worldview of Film and Media", Phillips argued that Christians need to approach film with Biblical principles in mind, while being wary of un-Christian messages in modern film culture. Because the Vision Forum hosts the San Antonio Christian Film Festival, it does not surprise me that Phillips would devote a workshop to modern film.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

May 21st Has Come and Gone

. . . and we're still here!

The media and blogosphere has devoted considerable attention to Harold Camping of Family Radio Worldwide, who predicted that the Rapture would occur at 6 p.m. on Saturday, May 21st. With outreach campaigns such as Project Jonah, Family Radio Worldwide has promoted its May 21st Rapture prediction far and wide. Fearing that the end was near, several distraught people committed acts of violence, including a mother who sliced her daughters' throats and a Nairobi man who committed suicide.

While most coverage of Camping has focused on his Rapture prediction, some outlets have also taken note of his considerable homophobia. The video below captures Camping's attitudes toward gays, lesbians, and the city of San Fransisco, which he calls a "wicked area".

(Hat tip to Truth Wins Out. Click here if you're having trouble viewing the video.)



At the 2:26 mark of the video, Camping describes homosexuality as something akin to addiction that can be cured through faith.

MAN: Have you ever gotten a phone call on Open Forum from someone who was maybe struggling with--


CAMPING: Of course we get calls like that, and I always encourage them if they become a child of God, then there will be a big change in their character. They won't want to be that anymore. That's just the nature of salvation. That's why, for example, an alcoholic--alcohol for them has become their god. They find that if they take that drink, they can face life. The person who's a homosexual is slave to sex. He can't give it up. It just possesses him. Anything that we are a slave to, that becomes a god. The only way they can get real victory over it is if they have their heart changed, and only God can do that.
The Family Radio Worldwide website features a document entitled Gay Pride: Planned by God as a Sign of the End, available for download at www[dot]familyradio[dot]com/PDFS/gay_pride.pdf. In Gay Pride, Camping claims that the success of the LGBT movement is a sign from the divine that judgment day is near. He cites the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, in which the men of Sodom demanded that Lot hand over his angelic guests for abuse, only to be blinded and later destroyed by God. Camping likens the destruction of Sodom to the destruction of Judgment Day, with homosexuality as a common variable in both eras. Other current events, such as the founding of Israel in 1948, the rise of the Charismatic movement, and the supposed "spiritual decay" in many churches, also herald the approach of Judgment Day.

Lambasting homosexuality as sinful, the document laments that homosexuality has been accepted across the globe as an "alternative lifestyle" instead of being hidden. Before the present day, it claims, homosexuality was only present to a small degree as part of idol worship. God has allegedly given up people to homosexuality as a sign that the end times are approaching.

Camping's condemnation of homosexuality has much in common with other Religious Right diatribes against the LGBT community: homosexuality as a sexual and spiritual pathology that can allegedly be cured, homosexuality as incompatible with Christianity, the Sodom and Gomorrah story interpreted as a condemnation of LGBT people, etc. As with other fundamentalists, the LGBT community was singled out as a menacing scapegoat in Camping's end times eschatology.

To learn more about Family Radio Worldwide and their Rapture prediction, visit www[dot]familyradio[dot]com. For additional news and commentary, visit the following links:

CBS News: How Harold Camping Marketed the Rapture

New York Magazine: A Conversation with Harold Camping, Prophesier of Judgment Day

Religion Dispatches: 5 Lessons Learned from the Apocalypse Fail, Or, It’s Not the End of the World as We Know It, and I Feel So-So

Talk to Action: Harold Camping's Days Are Numbered: A Quick and Dirty Guide to the Rapture

Infidel753: It was just an ordinary day, dumbasses

Monday, May 16, 2011

2011 CHAP Convention -- Ken Ham

Smoked ham, not Ken Ham
On May 13th and 14th, I attended the Christian Homeschool Association of Pennsylvania (CHAP) annual convention in Harrisburg, PA. Held in the sprawling Harrisburg Farm Show Complex, the CHAP Convention attracts thousands of Christian homeschooler families from across Pennsylvania, as well as prominent Religious Right organizations and speakers. This year's line-up of speakers included Ken Ham from Answers in Genesis, Doug Phillips from Vision Forum, Phillip Telfer from Media Talk 101, and many more.

A homeschooling convention offers a unique opportunity to learn about fundamentalist Christian thought, given that it focuses on presenting distilled, basic ideas about fundamentalism to the next generation. Let's start with some of Ken Ham's workshops, which addressed everything from creationism to deconversion among youth. Ham, founder of the Creation Museum in Petersburg, KY, briefly appeared in Bill Maher's 2008 film Religulous.

In a Friday morning workshop entitled "Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will Quit Church and What You Can Do to Stop It," Ham addressed widespread deconversion among formerly Christian youth (a topic addressed in his 2009 book Already Gone.)

Sunday, May 15, 2011

A Review of THE CHILD: AMERICA'S BATTLE FOR THE NEXT GENERATION

A few weeks ago, I attended a public viewing of a "parental rights" film entitled The Child: America's Battle for the Next Generation. Released by Watchman Cinema in 2010, The Child alleges that government intervention is supposedly threatening parents' freedom to make decisions regarding the upbringing of their children. With commentary from right-wing figures such as Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America, Steven Groves of the Heritage Foundation, and Michael Farris of the Home School Legal Defense Association, The Child offered a glimpse into the beliefs of the parental rights movement.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

David Barton in the Media Spotlight

As mentioned in my previous post, right-wing historian and Wallbuilders founder David Barton has been in the media spotlight this week, thanks to a front-page article in the New York Times and an interview with Jon Stewart on the May 4th edition of The Daily Show. (Parts I and II of the extended interview are available at The Daily Show website as well.)

Barton, author of Separation of Church and State: What the Founders Meant, has been celebrated by figures on the right such as Glenn Beck and Mike Huckabee, while being accused of promoting revisionist history by critics on the left. Interestingly enough, Barton accuses other historical sources of being revisionist in a 2005 post at Wallbuilders. (See www[dot]wallbuilders[dot]com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=112)

The New York Times article highlighted the advisory role Barton plays for several prominent right-wing political figures, including Newt Gingrich and Michelle Bachmann. It also discussed his right-leaning political views, noting that Barton maintains a network of approximately seven-hundred anti-abortion legislators. Most importantly, the article did not flinch from the controversies surrounding Barton's historical work, which several commentators have branded as distorted history. Nor did it neglect some of Barton's more controversial conclusions, such as his belief that the Founding Fathers did not intend to have a high wall of separation between church and state, as well as his 1988 study correlating out-of-wedlock births, violent crime, and declining SAT scores with bans on prayer in public school.

During his appearance on the May 4th edition of The Daily Show, Barton described his work with original American historical documents as "historical reclamation." When Jon Stewart pressed him about his work on school textbooks and curriculum, Barton insisted that his curricula added more details about minorities and women in early American history. When Stewart confronted him about his stance on church-state separation, Barton argued that the Founding Fathers intended for separation of institutions, not separation of influence.

While the article and the interview with Jon Stewart helped make more people aware of Barton, they really only scratched the surface of the controversies surrounding his work. People for the American Way have released two hard-hitting articles on Barton's work, as well as his controversial positions on LGBT rights, environmental issues, religious minorities, and church-state separation.

People for the American Way: Barton’s Bunk: Religious Right ‘Historian’ Hits the Big Time in Tea Party America

People for the American Way: David Barton: Propaganda Masquerading as History

Friday, May 6, 2011

Commentary Tidbits: David Barton Edition

Between a recent front-page article in the New York Times and an appearance on the May 4th edition of The Daily Show, right-wing historian David Barton has been in the media spotlight this week. The progressive blogosphere has been abuzz about Barton's media coverage, so for your reading pleasure, I have included several commentary pieces on Barton below.


Mother Jones: GOP's Favorite Fake Historian Spins the New York Times

Talking Points Memo: Jon Stewart Spars With Social Conservative David Barton Over Church And State 

Politicus USA: Jon Stewart Skewers David Barton’s Historical Pretensions

Religion Dispatches: Why Won't David Barton Submit to Peer Review?

Chris Rodda at the Huffington Post: Do Well By Doing Good

Talk to Action: David Barton and Jon Stewart: Mainstreaming the American Dolchstoßlegende

SPLC Hatewatch: David Barton: Extremist "Historian" for the Christian Right

Right Wing Watch: David Barton Lies to Jon Stewart on Sharia Law Views

Right Wing Watch: Fact Checking Barton, Parts I, II, III, IV, and V

Monday, May 2, 2011

Religious Right Reactions to Osama bin Laden's Death

Last evening, the world learned that Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaida leader who claimed responsibility for the September 11th attacks, had been killed in a raid in Pakistan by U.S. special forces. After DNA tests confirmed that the man shot was indeed bin Laden, he was buried at sea after an Islamic funeral on board an aircraft carrier, according to media reports.

This is a momentous moment for the U.S., and commentators from across the political spectrum have been weighing in. Since this blog focuses on the Religious Right, I wanted to share what several Religious Right figures have said about bin Laden's demise. Some voices commended the military personnel who carried out the operation, others were passionate and jubilant, while others still wove political commentary into bin Laden's death.

- At its Washington Update blog, the Family Research Council praised U.S. military personnel for laying their lives on the line during the operation that killed bin Laden. FRC reminded readers that terrorist networks still pose a threat, as a new chapter in the war on terror awaits.

(See www[dot]frc[dot]org/get.cfm?i=WU11E01&f=PG07J01)

- At the Heritage Foundation's Foundry blog, Heritage Foundation president Edwin J. Feulner warned President Obama and Congress not to use bin Laden's death as an "excuse" to repeal "counterterrorism tools" such as the USA PATRIOT Act.

(See blog[dot]heritage[dot]org/2011/05/02/morning-bell-bin-laden-dead/)

- Also at the Foundry, Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow Cully Stimpson insisted that "strategic interrogations" of detainees at Guantanamo Bay provided vital information leading to the location of Osama bin Laden. I'm curious as to how Stimpson feels about allegations of detainee mistreatment at Guantanamo.

(See blog[dot]heritage[dot]org/2011/05/02/detainee-interrogations-key-to-killing-osama-bin-laden/#more-58444)

- Former governor Mike Huckabee was jubilant about bin Laden's death in a statement at the Huck PAC website. Condemning bin Laden as a "madman, murderer and terrorist", Huckabee hoped that bin Laden's death would serve as a message to Islamic extremists that the U.S. will tenaciously pursue those who terrorize its people.

(Hat tip to Right Wing Watch. See www[dot]huckpac[dot]com/?Fuseaction=Blogs.View&Blog_id=3457)

- At the CBN Brody File blog, CBN chief political correspondent David Brody admonished President Obama for showing insufficient joy after bin Laden's death, calling him "Mr. Non-Emotion." Brody speculated that the president was using a measured tone to avoid inflaming the Arab world. Later, however, Brody apologized, noting that President Obama lived by the principle of Proverbs 24:17 ("Do not gloat when your enemy falls; when they stumble, do not let your heart rejoice.") whereas he did not.

(Hat tip to Right Wing Watch. See blogs[dot]cbn[dot]com/thebrodyfile/archive/2011/05/02/obamas-bin-laden-speech-misses-mark.aspx)

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Newt Gingrich at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast

The National Catholic Prayer Breakfast took place on April 26th and 27th in Washington D.C., sporting its 2011 theme of "Celebrating the Beatification of John Paul the Great". Beginning on April 26th with mass at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in the Crypt, the event concluded with a breakfast program at the Marriott Wardman Park on the morning of April 27th. Several well-known right-wing figures spoke at this year's breakfast, including Lila Rose of LiveAction, Bishop William E. Lori of the Bridgeport Diocese, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, and former speaker of the House New Gingrich. (See www[dot]catholicprayerbreakfast[dot]com for more information.)

In a transcript of Newt Gingrich's prayer breakfast speech posted on Facebook, Gingrich spoke of the late Pope John Paul II and his 1979 visit to Poland. He mused on the political impact of Pope John Paul II's visit on communism and Gingrich's own documentary on the subject, Nine Days that Changed the World. (See www[dot]facebook[dot]com/notes/newt-gingrich/text-of-my-speech-to-the-national-catholic-prayer-breakfast-this-morning/170642579658012)

Gingrich's speech also contained commentary on religion and society. The online transcript of the speech denounces U.S. "elites" who, in their supposed yearning to mimic "European elites", allegedly inject anti-religious values into academia, media, and the judiciary. Journalist Sofia Resnick reported on the event for the American Independent and Iowa Independent, devoting special attention to Gingrich's comments on "coercive secularism." The articles highlight Gingrich's examples of this alleged "coercive secularism," including a 1962 Supreme Court decision declaring school prayer unconstitutional, the recent removal of a cross from a veterans' memorial in the Mojave National Preserve, and the trend of replacing A.D. (anno Domini) with C.E. (common era). A CNN article also noted Gingrich's claim that a growing "government-favored pagan culture" meant to replace Christianity has allegedly emerged in Europe.

Frankly, I'm growing tired of Religious Right rhetoric that construes church-state separation measures as somehow anti-religious. Such measures ensure that American citizens do not have religion thrust upon them by the government, thereby safeguarding everyone's religious liberty. How is it "coercive" to prevent one religion or one form of religious expression from having political dominance over others?

For additional news and commentary, visit the following links.

Talking Points Memo: Gingrich: Secular Elites Have Declared War on Time Itself

Politico: New Gingrich Warns: Creeping Secularism Replacing Christianity

Beliefnet: Gingrich Talks of Journey to Catholicism